Men's 60+ · 11 ranked

Power Rating

Finish order against everyone you have shot with, across every season, with the strength of each field taken out. As of Nov 7, 2026.
#AthletePower RatingAdjusted %Ahead / behindEvidenceEventsLast event
1
Jeff Craddock provisional
1702 80.35 29 / 0 2.3 3 Constellis NC 2026
2 MG
Mike Griswold
1262 80.16 33 / 5 3.8 5 Deep Creek MT 2026
3 RB
Robert Boyd
1209 82.09 41 / 8 5.0 6 Cowtown AZ 2026
4
Jeffery Plaisance
1198 82.43 22 / 4 4.1 5 Cowtown AZ 2026
5 RY
Roger Yoder provisional
777 74.21 15 / 15 3.2 4 Italy 2026
6 BW
Bruce Willey provisional
767 73.34 12 / 14 3.2 4 Constellis NC 2026
7 BP
Bob Porzio
748 76.49 23 / 19 4.1 5 Cowtown AZ 2026
8 TS
Todd Stouffer provisional
596 74.72 8 / 11 2.4 3 Deep Creek MT 2026
9 IC
Ian Crookston provisional
507 73.19 8 / 19 2.3 3 Deep Creek MT 2026
10 PN
Patrick Nuanez
502 73.83 20 / 25 4.9 6 Cowtown AZ 2026
11 BA
Bret Abbott provisional
408 73.34 10 / 18 2.5 3 Cowtown AZ 2026
How Power Rating works, and why it can disagree with a head-to-head

It is not an average and not a head-to-head. Every event is a set of comparisons: each athlete finished ahead of some of the field and behind the rest. The rating is the strength that best explains every one of those comparisons in the division, across every season on record. Beating a strong athlete moves you more than beating a weak one; a strong field that beats you costs less than a weak one. That is what takes the strength of each field out.

Recent results count more. A result loses half its weight every 18 months: a year old counts 63%, two years 40%, four years 15%. The "Evidence" column is the total weight an athlete's comparisons carry, in full-weight events. An athlete whose results are all three or four years old can have a long record and little evidence, and the rating is pulled toward 1000 when evidence is thin.

So two athletes can disagree with their own head-to-head. If A beat B twice in 2022 and B has won eleven events since 2023 against the current field while A has not competed, B rates higher today. The two meetings still stand (they are on the compare page), but they say who was better in 2022, at 15% weight now; the rating says who the evidence favours now.

Reading the numbers. 1000 is an average rated athlete; a 250-point gap is about a 73% chance of finishing ahead, 500 points about 88%. Adjusted % is the other view of the same results: what the athlete would be expected to score against an average field, in the % of possible you already read. Minimum 3 events to be rated; fewer than 5 is provisional. No result in 24 months: inactive, rated but unranked. Season points and standings are unchanged by any of this.

Hover a row for the plain-English version of that athlete's evidence. How scoring works →
Official partners SIG Sauer